Table of Contents Forums Dictionary Recommended Reading Marketplace Giftshop What I Ate Michael's Blog
Latest Post on Michael's Blog: Fall Television Season 2018 Grid
Books

The Science of Good Food

by Michael Chu
Next Page
One last reason to check out this book is something I discovered when skimming the bibliography. Under "Websites", Cooking For Engineers is listed as a reference!
The Science of Good Food is available in the following formats:
Paperback

Next Page
Written by Michael Chu
Published on November 02, 2008 at 12:45 AM
6 comments on The Science of Good Food:(Post a comment)

On November 06, 2008 at 11:57 PM, AussieAltissima (guest) said...
Hey, Congrats on your acknowledgement in the bibliography! "Cooking for Engineers" is one of my favourite food references too.


On November 08, 2008 at 01:43 AM, kayenne (guest) said...
Should I wait for a second or third edition to see if they will correct such errors?


On November 08, 2008 at 06:42 AM, Michael Chu said...
kayenne wrote:
Should I wait for a second or third edition to see if they will correct such errors?

Who knows when future editions (if any) will be published... The "bugs" in the current edition are really mostly nitpicking and me being a definition stickler. The common myths of how to keep onions from making you cry have no excuse however.


On October 27, 2011 at 06:08 PM, ruthie (guest) said...
Subject: not nitpicking
Quote:
Vitamin A is a lipid, but is not a fat. Similarly, cholesterol is a lipid but not a fat. But, here I'm nitpicking


That's not nitpicking, that's a pretty big goof, IMO. I may not be an engineer, but I've got about 40 units of University Biological Science courses behind me, so not an untutored reader. In my book, that's a big goof. I read books like these for the details, and if it's new-to-me information, I naturally want it to be correct. I want to use the info I find in a food science book with confidence.

Yeah, this is cholesterol, not a food, as such, but what makes it significant is that cholesterol is such i big bad in the popular mind. People are freakish enough on the subject as it is, without further confusing them and giving them yet another thing to obsess over.


On October 28, 2011 at 07:55 PM, yocona said...
Subject: Re: not nitpicking
ruthie wrote:
I may not be an engineer, but I've got about 40 units of University Biological Science courses behind me, so not an untutored reader. In my book, that's a big goof. I read books like these for the details, and if it's new-to-me information, I naturally want it to be correct. I want to use the info I find in a food science book with confidence.

Then you should check out CookWise, ruthie. Shirley Corriher is all about the science.


On October 29, 2011 at 02:09 AM, Michael Chu said...
Subject: Re: not nitpicking
yocona wrote:
ruthie wrote:
I may not be an engineer, but I've got about 40 units of University Biological Science courses behind me, so not an untutored reader. In my book, that's a big goof. I read books like these for the details, and if it's new-to-me information, I naturally want it to be correct. I want to use the info I find in a food science book with confidence.

Then you should check out CookWise, ruthie. Shirley Corriher is all about the science.

I second that recommendation for CookWise. They've finally got a paperback version out and it's available at many Costcos (or was last month). Bakewise is also excellent.

A couple of other books that do a great job on the science of cooking is Harold McGee's On Food and Cooking and Jeff Potter's Cooking for Geeks.

One last recommendation is the seemingly expensive ($450+) Modernist Cuisine which I think is worth every penny. At about $10 a pound, it's cheaper by weight than many other cookbooks and it really is the closest thing we have to the sum total of all current cooking knowledge in the world.

About CfE Contact User Agreement Privacy Policy FAQ's In the Press Write for CfE