| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ParrotSlave
Joined: 08 Nov 2012 Posts: 2 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If the glasses are so heavy that they're going to sink your nose into the nasal cavity, then I could understand going with plastic. Mine are -4.25 -50 x130 (right) and -3.75 -50 x035 (left) [sphere, cylinder, axis]. I have tried various plastic lenses several times, and what has driven me crazy is not chromatic aberration so much as the distortion at the edge of the visual field, which I find particularly disturbing when driving, especially at night. It's getting harder to find glass lenses, but I do note a Canadian company that still has high index ultra thin glass lenses that should work well in cases of extreme myopia: http://www.visionsofcanada.com/csi/awb/voc/high-myopia.asp. A separate problem is that the opticians tend to try and sell smaller lenses in glass, since they worry about the weight, and, unfortunately, when one is used to gigantic lenses, a shift in lens size can create difficulty in adjusting. I find myself still reverting to a 1996 pair of no-line trifocals with PhotoGray in Flexon frames--the best pair I ever had, also, coincidentally, the heaviest, and with the largest lenses. Opticians seem to have no understanding of physics as they try to "convert" me to the plastic religion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Cooley
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 232 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fascinating! Thanks for the links. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|